#29J Support the Show 7 Days a Week 9PM Free Speech Lives
#29J Support the Show 7 Days a Week 9PM Free Speech Lives
FREE TODAY!!
Here is a perfect example of something which I didn’t even know was going into effect until JUST prior to it happening – the NEW demand for anyone entering the E.U. countries being required to have their fingerprints scanned, (as a condition of access) – a reporter PRETENDING TO be ‘excited’ at the prospect!! FFS:
HE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS TODAY! DISGUSTING:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/eu-entryexit-system
After a lengthy interaction with ChatGPT about the above – this is what ChatGPT claims is applicable in ‘today’s’ courts:
Glad you asked — here’s the real, legally recognised framework of presumptions in English (and broadly Commonwealth) law, as used in actual courts.
These are openly published in judicial guidance, case law, and evidential statutes — not secret or symbolic.
Every person charged with an offence is presumed innocent until proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
All adults are presumed to be of sound mind and legally responsible for their acts.
Official acts, public records, and administrative decisions are presumed to have been properly performed unless evidence shows irregularity.
A child born during a lawful marriage is presumed to be the legitimate child of the husband.
A person not heard from for seven years is presumed dead.
Transfers of property between certain close relations (e.g. father → child, husband → wife) are presumed to be gifts, not loans.
A signed deed or negotiable instrument is presumed supported by valid consideration.
Parliament is presumed not to intend legislation to have retroactive effect.
Statutes are read so that judicial review remains available unless Parliament expressly says otherwise.
When interpreting statutes, courts presume Parliament did not intend to take private property without fair compensation.
Courts construe domestic law consistently with international obligations and human-rights standards.
Once a proven state of affairs exists (e.g., possession, status, marriage), it’s presumed to continue until evidence shows change.
| Type | Example | Rebuttable? |
|---|---|---|
| Substantive | Innocence, Sanity, Legitimacy | Yes/No (varies) |
| Procedural | Regularity, Continuity | Yes |
| Interpretive (statutory) | No retroactivity, property rights | Yes (with clear words) |
So, in reality, courts apply many presumptions, but they are open, documented, and subject to challenge.
There’s no hidden “12-presumption code.”
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SCHEDULE:
President Trump answered media questions on Friday afternoon 10th Oct:
I asked ChatGPT about the ‘goal’ of those who follow ‘Islam’:
That’s an excellent — and layered — question. The answer depends on whether you mean the theological goal (from within Islam itself), the social or civilisational goal (as developed in Islamic history), or the political goal (as pursued by certain movements). Let’s look at each clearly and factually:
From the Islamic point of view, the ultimate goal is submission to the will of God (Allah).
So, the spiritual goal is:
In Islamic teaching, faith and society are intertwined. Islam doesn’t separate religion and governance as many Western systems do.
This doesn’t necessarily mean expansionism by force — many Islamic empires expanded through trade and diplomacy — but it does mean Islam sees itself as a complete moral, social, and legal framework, not just a private belief.
Different eras and sects have interpreted Islam’s worldly mission differently:
| Dimension | Goal |
|---|---|
| Spiritual/Theological | Submission to God and moral perfection |
| Social | A just community guided by divine law |
| Civilisational | To establish a moral order based on Qur’an and Sunnah |
| Political (varied) | For some: re-establishment of Islamic governance; for others: peaceful coexistence while practicing Islam fully |
Would you like me to summarise how this goal evolved historically — from the Prophet Muhammad’s early community in Medina to the modern nation-state context (e.g. why some seek “Islamic revival” today)?
What about Islam being a ‘living’ thing – I’ve heard many Muslims state, categorically, that as the Qur’an is the direct word of God, the creator of all things, including man, man has no right to alter all that God ‘said’…hence why the Qur’an is treated with such reverence – any mishandling is considered blasphemy?
ChatGPT:
Exactly — that’s a very accurate understanding, and it gets to the heart of how Muslims view their scripture and their faith as a “living” reality rather than a historical document.
Let’s explore that idea step by step, because it explains much about both Islam’s endurance and its tensions with modern reform.
1. The Qur’an as the Literal Word of God
- Muslims believe the Qur’an is not inspired writing, but the actual speech of God (Allah) revealed verbatim in Arabic to the Prophet Muhammad through the angel Gabriel between 610–632 CE.
- Therefore, it’s considered perfect, eternal, and unchangeable.
- The Prophet himself is viewed as the final messenger — the “Seal of the Prophets” — so no new revelation can supersede it.
“It is We who have sent down the Reminder, and We will surely guard it.” (Q 15:9)
This belief makes the Qur’an the fixed reference point for belief, law, ethics, and worship.
2. Why It’s Treated with Such Reverence
Because it’s viewed as God’s own speech (kalam Allah):
- Physical copies must be kept clean and handled respectfully.
- Muslims perform ritual washing (wuduʾ) before touching it.
- It’s recited melodiously, memorised by millions (as ḥuffāẓ), and never altered.
- Deliberate desecration or mocking of it is widely regarded as blasphemy — not just insult to a book, but to God Himself.
This reverence isn’t mere ritualism; it reflects a living relationship: the Qur’an is spoken, heard, recited, and acted upon daily.
3. “Islam as a Living Thing”
Muslims often describe Islam as living because:
- The Qur’an and prophetic example (Sunnah) are considered timeless guidance — applicable to every era.
- Through ongoing interpretation (ijtihād), scholars apply fixed principles to new realities — technology, medicine, finance, politics.
- The language of revelation (Arabic) is still used in worship exactly as 1,400 years ago — keeping that sense of continuity.
So while the text itself never changes, how it’s applied evolves.
That’s how Muslims reconcile eternal scripture with a changing world:The message is immutable; its application requires human reasoning.
4. Why “Man Has No Right to Alter It”
This conviction arose because:
- Earlier scriptures (Torah, Gospel) are seen in Islamic tradition as original revelations that were later altered by human hands.
- The Qur’an therefore positions itself as the final, preserved correction.
- Any attempt to “edit” or “reinterpret” its plain meaning too freely is viewed as repeating past mistakes.
Hence, while scholars debate interpretation (tafsīr), the text itself is sacrosanct — not to be rewritten, translated loosely, or used irreverently.
Even translations are called “interpretations of the meaning,” not “the Qur’an” itself, because only the Arabic form is considered the true revelation.
5. Summary
Concept Muslim Understanding Nature of Qur’an Literal, uncreated Word of God, revealed in Arabic Human role Interpret and apply, not alter Reverence Physical and spiritual purity required; mishandling seen as sacrilege Reasoning Encouraged within limits — adapt life to scripture, not scripture to life Result Islam remains a “living” guidance, stable yet continuously interpreted
So yes — for believing Muslims, the Qur’an is alive in the sense of being eternally relevant and operative, not a static text.
Its reverence stems from the conviction that it is God’s voice in human language — and no one has authority to modify that.
