#29J Support the Show 7 Days a Week 9PM Free Speech Lives
#29J Support the Show 7 Days a Week 9PM Free Speech Lives
Over the past ten years especially, I’ve spent considerable time researching historical events, unexplained accounts, old books, government organisations, scientific developments and the information we’ve been presented with throughout our lives.
What has increasingly fascinated me is how certain events appear to connect when examined chronologically.
In particular, I’ve been exploring the possibility that our world may be far more expansive than we’ve been led to understand, and that territories beyond the familiar boundaries of the Arctic and Antarctic may hold answers to questions humanity has been discouraged from asking.
And I have developed a theory about why.
What if the public’s attention was deliberately directed upwards, towards outer space, to distract us from exploring outwards, towards what might lie beyond our known world?
This isn’t simply about people becoming interested in astronomy or space exploration. My belief is that the change in direction was intentional, carefully presented through television, films, newspapers, magazines and eventually entire government programmes.
And when I examine the historical chronology, I find that possibility increasingly compelling.
One account that interests me is that of Olaf Jansen, whose extraordinary journey is described in Willis George Emerson’s 1908 book, The Smoky God.
The narrative places Jansen’s voyage in the Arctic during the nineteenth century. He describes travelling north with his father, encountering increasingly warm conditions and eventually discovering an unfamiliar inhabited world.
What particularly interests me is the description of the journey itself: the transition appears gradual, with the geography changing as they continue travelling.
Could what has been described as Inner Earth actually represent something farther outwards?
I have also been studying the remarkable Antarctic expeditions undertaken by explorers including James Clark Ross, Roald Amundsen, Robert Falcon Scott, Douglas Mawson and Admiral Richard E. Byrd.
Byrd’s first Antarctic expedition began in 1928, followed by his second expedition in 1933–1935.
Then we come to Germany.
The German expedition led by Alfred Ritscher surveyed part of Queen Maud Land, naming the region Neuschwabenland, or New Swabia.
This particularly interests me because of the later accounts concerning German technological developments, unusual aircraft and possible encounters with advanced civilisations.
I’ve encountered theories suggesting that German researchers obtained technological knowledge from inhabitants of lands beyond the familiar world.
That possibility forms part of my wider investigation into the origins of some of the technologies developed during the twentieth century.
The Second World War ended in 1945.
Germany had been regarded as the enemy, yet almost immediately the United States began recruiting German scientists and engineers through what became known as Operation Paperclip.
One of those scientists was Wernher von Braun, who had worked on the Nazi V-2 rocket programme.
Meanwhile, on 24 October 1945, the United Nations came into existence.
In 1946, the UN formally adopted its circular, North Pole-centred world-map emblem.
During 1946–1947, Admiral Byrd participated in Operation Highjump, a substantial American naval expedition to Antarctica.
And then there’s the Secret Diary, dated 19 February 1947.
Its account describes an Arctic flight during which Byrd’s aircraft apparently came under the control of an unseen force. He describes extraordinary disc-shaped aircraft, swastika-like markings and an encounter with a mysterious leader known as the Master.
What I find especially intriguing is that this account concerns the Arctic, whereas Operation Highjump was taking place in Antarctica.
That geographical distinction also brings me back to Olaf Jansen’s northern journey.
Then, in 1948, the World Health Organization formally came into existence, adopting an emblem incorporating the same circular UN world map, with the serpent-entwined staff of Asclepius added.
We have major international organisations emerging, German scientists being recruited into America, substantial polar operations and new arrangements for international scientific and political cooperation.
All within a remarkably short period.
On 8 December 1954, Admiral Byrd appeared on American television discussing the polar regions and the vast areas still awaiting exploration.
Now, consider the period in which he was speaking.
Television ownership was growing rapidly, but it was still a relatively new medium. Newspapers, radio, magazines, cinema newsreels and films played enormous roles in shaping public understanding.
Most ordinary people couldn’t personally visit Antarctica. They relied upon what governments, broadcasters, publishers and filmmakers presented to them.
And this brings me to Walt Disney.
On 9 March 1955, Disney broadcast Man in Space, collaborating with none other than Wernher von Braun.
A former German rocket scientist was now appearing in programmes produced by one of the world’s most influential entertainment companies, explaining the possibilities of travelling into space.
Disney’s extraordinary ability to create captivating visual imagery was being applied to the idea of space travel.
To me, this is a particularly important connection.
Because if you wanted millions of people to become fascinated by an idea, what better way than to bring together scientific authority, popular entertainment and powerful visual storytelling?
In October 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1.
NASA was established in July 1958 and began operations on 1 October of that year.
The public’s attention was increasingly being directed towards rockets, satellites, astronauts and the possibilities of travelling beyond Earth.
And my question is whether that change of focus served another purpose entirely.
On 1 December 1959, twelve nations signed the Antarctic Treaty.
The agreement established rules concerning peaceful activity, scientific cooperation, territorial claims and inspections.
Antarctica was increasingly becoming a region of internationally coordinated scientific activity.
Then, on 25 May 1961, President John F. Kennedy announced the American objective of landing a man on the Moon before the decade ended.
Think about the significance of that announcement.
An entire nation was being given a mission, a destination and a deadline.
For the remainder of the decade, the Moon became an extraordinary focus of public attention.
Television programmes, educational materials, newspaper headlines, scientific presentations and popular entertainment all helped bring that objective into people’s homes.
And this is where my theory becomes particularly important.
I believe the focus on the Moon was part of a deliberate programme to direct humanity’s curiosity upwards rather than outwards.
Not simply to encourage a new scientific ambition, but potentially to draw attention away from the polar regions and whatever might exist beyond the familiar geographical boundaries.
I should explain that my doubts about space exploration didn’t begin recently.
I remember visiting the Smithsonian in Washington when I was approximately ten, eleven or twelve years old.
I saw what was presented as a space capsule that had carried people into space.
And I remember looking at it and thinking how extraordinarily small it was.
How could men tolerate such cramped conditions? How could they undertake such a journey, with all the uncertainties and dangers they were supposedly facing?
Even as a child, something about it troubled me.
I couldn’t reconcile what I was looking at with the extraordinary journey I was being told had taken place.
But I was young. The exhibits were presented by a respected institution, and naturally I assumed that what I was being told was true.
That memory has stayed with me for decades.
Over the years, I’ve questioned other historical events and official accounts, and my research has led me towards a very different interpretation of the Space Age.
I have come to believe that human beings never travelled to the Moon, and I question whether humanity has ever travelled beyond Earth’s atmosphere.
I accept that rockets have been launched, but I question how far they can travel and whether the physical and electromagnetic boundaries I believe surround our world can be crossed.
I also question the imagery presented to us concerning orbital space stations and other supposedly inhabited structures in space.
My doubts extend well beyond the Moon landings themselves.
For me, the larger question concerns the possibility that the public has been presented with a carefully constructed narrative about what lies above us while being discouraged from investigating what might lie beyond us.
On 20 July 1969, the world was presented with the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
Millions watched the televised images and accepted them as an extraordinary achievement.
I understand that this is the established historical account.
But having examined the questions, doubts and alternative explanations I’ve encountered over many years, I no longer personally accept that account.
And I find myself returning to a very simple question:
What if the greatest achievement of the Space Age was not reaching another world, but convincing humanity to focus its attention away from unexplored possibilities much closer to home?
This is the central idea behind my investigation.
I believe that those who controlled the major channels of information had enormous influence over what the public was encouraged to believe, investigate and imagine.
In an age before the internet, ordinary people had limited opportunities to challenge the images and explanations presented by television networks, film studios, newspapers, governments and scientific institutions.
The public largely had to trust the information it received.
And I believe that this made it possible to direct humanity’s attention on an extraordinary scale.
When I look at the sequence of Antarctic expeditions, German technological developments, Operation Paperclip, the creation of international organisations, Disney’s space productions, NASA, the Antarctic Treaty and Kennedy’s Moon objective, I see a chronology worthy of much closer investigation.
My theory is that this was not simply a natural change in scientific interests, but a calculated redirection of public attention.
The possibility of lands beyond the polar regions interests me far more than the endless promotion of journeys into outer space.
And if the accounts of Admiral Byrd, Olaf Jansen and others contain clues to a world more expansive than we’ve been taught, I believe those possibilities deserve to be explored.
I intend to continue examining the maps, historical records, books, interviews and accounts that have led me along this extraordinary path.
I invite you to read the books, examine the documents, watch the original interviews and consider the chronology for yourself.
Come to your own conclusions, and share your thoughts in the comments below.
Because after all these years of investigation, my central question has become:
What if humanity was deliberately encouraged to LOOK UP THERE — so that we wouldn’t look OVER THERE?
Based Amy — Sunday, 25 October 2026
Operation High Jump took place in 1946 and its main aim was to complete a more detailed map of the Continent … The following is one version of what took place:
Admiral Byrd’s diaries include the event in 1947 where he explained his journey to ‘Middle Earth’:
Under the flight-log entries for 11:30 a.m. through 11:40 a.m.
There’s another passage later, during his departure, describing the same unseen force lifting the aircraft to 2,700 feet, before control is eventually returned.Read the complete alleged 1947 diary
These are passages from the Secret Diary, rather than Byrd’s authenticated expedition journals.
For a larger, more comfortable reading view, click the file name located directly below the book, to the LEFT of the Download button.
The PDF will open in a new browser tab, where you can use the + (plus) button at the top to enlarge the pages.
Alternatively, click Download to save the book to your device.
📱 READING ON A PHONE OR TABLET?
Open the PDF in a new tab, turn your device sideways for a wider view, and use two fingers to zoom in and enlarge the pages for more comfortable reading.
