603c9f6e 38a0 42d1 bff5 6048339008bd

CROWN COURT DATE MOVED TO 27th January – SENIOR JUDGE TAKEN CASE!!!

On Wednesday 22nd January I received a phone call from Southwark Crown Court and was informed that my hearing, for ‘Mention’ for my upcoming Appeal,which was due to take place this Friday 24th, had been picked up by the most SENIOR Judge at Southwark, (reason unknown), so that meant my hearing needed to be rescheduled for Monday 27th January. (It appeared that the Judge couldn’t make this Friday, so it needed to be rescheduled at her instruction)!

When I inquired as to the judge’s name, I was simply told ‘Taylor’ and when I asked whether it was a male or female, was told a female judge. My final question was asking her First name, but was told by the caller that she didn’t know!! (BS)!

After the call, I Googled the name and was somewhat astonished to see that this is the same judge who sentenced Wikileaks Director/Owner, Julian Assange, to his 50 weeks in HMP Belmarsh!!

So, my original trial had been taken over by the most senior Magistrate, (Emma Arbuthnot), who’s not only the Chief Magistrate of Westminster Magistrates’ Court, but the most senior Magistrate in the whole of England – remember, this whole saga was PURELY over me having called Anna Soubry a TRAITOR…NOW, my ‘Mention’ Hearing has been nabbed by the most senior Judge at Southwark Crown Court!

Curiouser and curiouser!

I will be representing myself, (as my legal team failed miserably, despite the overwhelming evidence in my favour).

The link to Judge Taylor’s Sentencing Remarks for Julian Assange’s trial is below.

Please comment below as to your thoughts:

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/sentencing-remarks-assange-010519.pdf

Episode 3: The TRUTH About The Origins of The EU or The ‘Europaische WirtschaftsGemeinschaft’, 1942…

The third episode is a continuation of the lecture by Walther Funk, (the Economic Minister and President of the German Reichsbank in 1942); he continues to express his opinion of the potential economic development of Europe, (as a whole with Germany in charge), after the war ends.

I believe that it is potentially one of the MOST important documents of Modern Times, because at some point since 1942, it has been acknowledged that the ‘Europaische WirtschaftsGemeinschaft’, was the blueprint for the creation and development of what is today known as ‘The European Union’; I feel certain that very few, if any, British people will have even heard of this document, let alone have read it. This is due to the fact that the theories expressed by most of the contributing economists, have almost entirely come true; one of the most incredible aspects, (and for me the most sickening), is the realisation I’ve had whilst reading it, is that The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland was never meant to be included as a contributing member of the ‘European Economic Community’, but rather, she was meant to remain as one of Europe’s main COMPETITORS!

The Europaische WirtschaftsGemeinschaft was, ‘..Created as a series of seminars by the Third Reich’s Economic Minister and various advisers to Adolf Hitler, so that in the event the Nazis should fall to the allies and lose the war, they could complete their plans covertly by subversion, treason and sedition from ‘within each government.’

For Calling an MP a ‘Traitor’….

This was put together by a supporter of mine. Thank you Richard:

FOR CALLING AN MP A ‘TRAITOR’ :- 
1. Her phone line has been cut off – no Internet.

2. Her name was put on the Police National Computer, (PNC), as being ‘WANTED’ and to be ‘Arrested on sight’..

3. Police banged on the windows and door of her home, 4 mornings in a row, texted and phoned her multiple times ordering her to ‘turn herself in’.  

4. Treatment in custody was brutal.  

5. Is bruised, tired and being monitored.  

6. They have her phones.  

7. There will be an attempt to suggest that she is mentally unstable.  

8. Was incarcerated for 26 hours,  strip-searched, (violently., forcefully).

9. Money was stolen.

10. Denied her glasses.

11. They did not give her the phone call she was entitled to to inform of her detention.  

12. There will be no jury.  

13. Has committed NO crime.  (Called someone a name)…. 

14. Being pursued and monitored by SO-15 Counter-Terrorism Police.  

15. Bail conditions for a CIVIL, (not CRIMINAL) offence: Cannot go near Parliament,  (from just south of Trafalgar Square down to Lambeth Bridge. 

16. Cannot mention my accuser’s name on social media, nor speak of the upcoming trial, (in Magistrate’s Court, where nothing is officially recorded). 

17. Hearing on 19th September 9.45 at Westminster Magistrate’s Court.

18. Trial on 8th November, 2019.

If you tolerate this, YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT. 

The above are the experiences of Based Amy…..’ 

The ‘Laws’ I referred to during my ‘You Tube Broadcast’ on 11th August, Explained.

As I stated in my broadcast, ‘KNOWLEDGE IS POWER’…and with the unacceptable and unlawful actions many current police Constables are taking, especially during large protests, I am making it a mission of mine to try to share some of the legal knowledge I have gleaned over the past three years of, (accidentally), being a political activist.

Many of my activities happened to have been captured on video, either by myself or others and so much of what I refer to, especially with regard to my personal police encounters can be seen by You Tube; (simply type ‘Based Amy or ‘Amy_CrazyWorld or even ‘Amy Bacon Lady’, (the last one will contain footage of my ‘adventures/ and ‘misadventures’ at Speaker’s Corner, Hyde Park, 2018)!

Below, I will link the two legal references I spoke about last night, with regards to the police and their codes of practice or how they like to refer to them, as ‘PACE’, which is the abbreviation for, ‘Police and Criminal Evidence’ Act and the, ‘ECHR Article 5: Freedom & Security, with regards to our rights… Strictly speaking I prefer to go by English Law and as it happens, it’s the same Article number, just referencing: The Human Rights Act, 1998, (Article 5).

Unfortunately, English legislation today has become so convoluted and to such a degree that it can be hard to know which right refers to which legislation. I will try to keep references as straightforward as possible, so that those individuals who are out peacefully protesting, will gain the confidence, especially during moments of high stress, (such as when random ‘POLICY OFFICERS’ suddenly and quite aggressively, decide to order them about using high levels of noise, i.e. SHOUTING), to be able to bring to their mind key aspects of their LEGAL rights to quote back to the shouty police, in order to protect themselves against any abuse of police powers.

As it happens, just recently on the 3rd of August, during a large rally for Tommy Robinson, the police gradually became restless and as can be witness on many video clips, they became restless and decided to suddenly bark out to all and sundry,

“You are now breaking Section 14 of The Public Order Act, so if you do not disperse immediately, you will be liable to arrest….!”

After reviewing much of the video footage available on You Tube, I observed that many people either tried to comply with the orders being barked at them or gave minimal resistance.

As can be seen by the video below, I wasn’t quite so compliant or cooperative:

I referenced ’29J’, which wasn’t the appropriate article to use, under the particular circumstances shown in these clips, but it happened to work! (Most of the policy officers have no idea which piece of legislation 29J refers to and rather than look foolish, they either agreed or disagreed, until the end when they retreated.

Now, the legal Article which I spoke about last night in the show, is more apt to use when a ‘Section 14′ is bandied about, and it’s one that I genuinely hope to hear being quoted by my fellow protesters many times , (ESPECIALLY, at the next demonstration in London on the 24th August, in just 12 days’ time); which is ‘Article 5 of the ECHR’.

The main reason for me to use this particular one is only because it’s directly referenced in the Police, ‘PACE Code G, which stipulates the ‘police powers of arrest’ and what he/she needs to bear in mind, with regards to a person’s legal rights of ‘Freedom and Security’, (per ECHR Article 5), when making the decision of whether or not to arrest that person.

As I explain it somewhat in the first video, I will not repeat myself now; however, I will attach the relevant legislative documents’ links below and hope that many will take the time to read and digest the relevant parts.

PACE CODE G:

chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/117583/pace-code-g-2012.pdf
PACE CODE G

ECHR Article 5:

https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_5_ENG.pdf

I do prefer to reference English law whenever possible and the equivalent English law is:

Human Rights Act, 1998 Article 5:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1/part/I/chapter/4

(As it happens, in my online shop, I do have some reference cards available for people to purchase and wear at protests, which include the rights to peaceful protest under English Common Law, Article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215)..

Please do comment about this article below, as I’d appreciate the feedback: