If everyone in England learned the following information and felt confident enough to reference it whenever they were dealing with the English ‘Legal’ System, (ESPECIALLY, in court), the transformation would be astounding and the current ‘System of Governance’ would collapse on itself, imo.
One of the BEST explanations of how the ‘English Legal System’ is run; it exposes the deceptive practices that are used by the police, courts and our government in running our lives:
THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT
Canon 3228
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the
law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become
fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key
presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public
Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court
of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and
Guilt:
- The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman
Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private
Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and
rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private
Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and - The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who
have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the
Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and
deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked
and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public
servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and - The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the
capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath
and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless
openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members
have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such
individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand
under a public oath; and - The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the
capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a
solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless
openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the
Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune
from any personal accountability for their actions; and - The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and
therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and
jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the
summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or
attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and - The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted
stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be
detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal fiction non-human
“PERSON” that corporate-governments rules and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may
only lawfully hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the
presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody
by custodians; and - The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a
“resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P,
you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its agents as
a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are
both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the
presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the
rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court); - The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume
you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by
attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild
and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely
visiting by “invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public
trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant
reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and - The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is
that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of
Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current
matter. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general
guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and
you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate);
and - The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does
seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are
acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as
Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to
have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as
questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption
stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or
sheriffs to assert their false claim; and - The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the
law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the
judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a
psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know
your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary
presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or
magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
- The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private
business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead or
plead “not guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and
motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the
presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to
